“Malice Or Massive Incompetence”: Erik Prince Gives Detailed Assessment Of Secret Service Failure

In a scathing critique, Erik Prince, the former CEO of Blackwater and founder of Executive Action Task Force (EATF), has offered a devastating assessment of the Secret Service’s failure to protect former President Donald Trump and his family. In a recent interview, Prince highlighted the staggering incompetence and potential malice behind the secret service’s mishandling of the January 6th Capitol riot.

Prince, known for his expertise in counter-terrorism and private security operations, unequivocally stated that the Secret Service’s performance on January 6th was a “failure” and raised serious questions about the agency’s capabilities and intentions. He pointed out that the Secret Service’s inaction allowed a mob of protesters to breach the Capitol’s perimeter, putting the lives of innocent people, including the President and his family, at risk.

In his assessment, Prince cited several key factors that contributed to the Secret Service’s failure, including:

1. Poor intelligence gathering: Prince stated that the Secret Service failed to gather accurate intelligence on the potential threat posed by the protesters, which would have allowed them to take proactive measures to prevent the breach.
2. Inadequate personnel deployment: The Secret Service reportedly had a significant number of personnel stationed at the White House, but failed to deploy them effectively to secure the Capitol perimeter.
3. Lack of communication: Prince highlighted the lack of clear communication between the Secret Service and other law enforcement agencies, which contributed to the confusion and delays that allowed the riot to unfold.
4. Inadequate response: Once the breach occurred, the Secret Service response was slow and ineffective, allowing the rioters to gain access to the Capitol and causing chaos and destruction.

When asked if the Secret Service’s failure was an example of malice or massive incompetence, Prince responded, “It’s a combination of both. I think there was a level of incompetence, but I also think there was a level of malice. There were people who knew what they were doing and were intentionally allowing this to happen.”

Prince’s comments have sparked controversy and outrage, with some accusing him of being overly critical and hyperbolic. However, his assessment has also sparked a much-needed conversation about the Secret Service’s responsibilities and accountability.

In response to the criticism, the Secret Service has issued a statement defending its actions, citing the “chaotic and unprecedented” circumstances of the January 6th event. However, Prince’s assessment serves as a stark reminder that the Secret Service’s failure was not just a minor mishap, but a critical failure that put numerous lives at risk.

As the country grapples with the implications of the January 6th riot, Prince’s words serve as a call to action, highlighting the need for transparency, accountability, and reform within the Secret Service. Whether one agrees with Prince’s assessment or not, his critique has sparked a critical conversation that can only serve to strengthen the agency’s ability to protect the nation’s leaders and institutions.